The authors find that mean fluorescent intensity (MFI) of both FCS‐A and SSC‐A increase between CD3 + CD14 + double‐positive and single‐positive populations. Despite using a doublet discrimination gating strategy, they identify events expressing both T‐cell and monocyte‐specific markers CD3 and CD14. To define cytometry analysis parameters that more efficiently discriminate T‐cell conjugates from DE cells, Burel and colleagues leverage their knowledge of T‐cell monocyte conjugates found in the peripheral blood of humans ( 10). The majority of double‐positive events in nonimaging flow cytometric data with conventional doublet exclusion gating are doublets, while most of the events following OPT doublet exclusion gating from imaging flow cytometric data are single cells. Schematic representation traditional doublet exclusion gating of nonimaging flow cytometric data (a) and doublet exclusion gating using OPT gating of imaging flow cytometric data (b). While these methods are highly effective in eliminating the majority of contaminating doublets, not all T‐cell conjugates are removed from the data by these criteria alone ( 3). Alternatively, events can be passed through two successive gates of FSC‐A by FSC width (FSC‐W) and side scatter area (SSC‐A) by SSC width (SSC‐W) utilizing the low pulse width signal indicative of single cells ( Fig. First, events can be excluded that deviate from the linear correlation between the forward scatter area (FSC‐A) and the FSC height (FSC‐H) parameters. Two different types of gating strategies are commonly employed to exclude cell doublets from flow cytometry data. These findings suggest that changes in T‐cell conjugates are likely hallmarks of an active immune response. The frequency of T‐cell conjugates and the phenotype of the cells that comprise them often change in response to an organisms’ inflammatory state, such as following immunization or in cases of tuberculosis, dengue virus, and HIV infection ( 10, 11). It is therefore not surprising that T‐cell conjugates have been observed in the peripheral blood of humans. These interactions between T cells and APCs can result in the formation of cell: cell conjugates mediated through cell surface adhesion molecules ( 9). For major histocompatibility class II restricted CD4 + T cells, this surveillance occurs through interactions with antigen presenting cells (APCs) such as dendritic cells, monocytes, B cells, and macrophages ( 8). Following development, naïve T cells circulate through the blood and secondary lymphoid organs surveilling an organism for the signs of foreign antigen ( 7). Though they share a common stem cell progenitor, the development of the T‐ and B‐cell lineages occur in spatially distinct locations, thymus, and bone marrow, respectively, via highly regulated and selective processes centered on the expression and signaling events that emanate from the T‐ or B‐cell antigen receptors, TCR, and BCR ( 5, 6). ![]() Utilizing this new strategy for doublet discrimination, the authors argue that a majority of DE cells, identified by traditional singlet gating strategies, are actually T‐cell B‐cell conjugates. The authors develop a gating strategy to limit T‐and B‐cell conjugate contamination from the analysis of DE cell populations through the use of imaging flow cytometry, which provides additional key parameters, such as bright‐field area and bright‐field aspect ratio. In this issue, Burel and colleagues (in this issue) determine that commonly used analysis methods of nonimaging flow cytometric data do not efficiently resolve DE cells from a contaminating doublet population consisting of T‐cell B‐cell conjugates. As cytometry data are further parsed to describe new rare populations of cells, the need for methods to properly discriminate contaminating doublets from true single cells has become an important aspect of data analysis.Ī newly described rare population of lymphocytes coexpressing both a T‐cell receptor (TCR) and B‐cell receptor (BCR), termed dual expressing (DE) cells ( 4) has been identified in the blood of patients with Type 1 diabetes (T1D). Doublet events are often observed in flow cytometry data, whether a sample is obtained from tissue or blood ( 2, 3). Accurate identification of rare cells within a large number of events is hampered by the presence of artifacts and requires setting exclusionary gates to eliminate dying cells, cellular debris, autofluorescent cells, and cell doublets within analyzed populations ( 1). The analysis of rare cells in flow cytometry data requires the acquisition of large data sets to visualize a sufficient number of events.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |